Monday, April 28, 2014

New York Top Medicaid Fraud Attorney Inna Fershteyn provides details on Medicaid Fraud


New York Top Medicaid Fraud Attorney Inna Fershteyn provides details on Medicaid Fraud - what it is, the investigation process, and what you should do if you become the target of Medicaid investigation and prosecution.

Do you believe that you're receiving Medicaid coverage that you're not eligible for? Are you subject to an investigation? If the answer is yes, then it's imperative that you speak to an experienced attorney before speaking with any Medicaid Investigators. Due to the increase in Medicaid investigating people, you should be represented by a Medicaid Fraud attorney.

You want to prevent yourself from unintentionally incriminating yourself or unknowingly confessing to a crime. Voluntarily appearing at an interview and providing the requested documentation can lead to criminal prosecution where what you said and provided at the interview can be used against you in a court of law.

The Law Office of Inna Fershteyn and Associates, P.C. is a New York City law firm that represents residents from New York and New Jersey experiencing Medicaid Fraud and any other health care fraud criminal charges.

For more information see http://www.BrooklynTrustAndWill.com

Law Office of Inna Fershteyn and Associates
1517 Voorhies Avenue
Suite 4
Brooklyn, NY 11235
(718) 333-2394

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Firm Picked to Run LICH Paid $95M to Settle Medicare Fraud Suit

 Dozens of protesters gathered in front of LICH, fighting SUNY Downstate's decision to end emergency ambulance service to the hospital.

The company selected to run the proposed new Long Island College Hospital paid nearly $100 million in fines to the feds to settle accusations it systematically defrauded the U.S. health care system for nearly 15 years, DNAinfo New York has learned.

The U.S. Justice Department alleged that Quorum Health kept two sets of books on its Medicare costs from 1985 to 1999 — one of which contained inflated, reimbursable medical costs, which it presented to the government for payment. And in a separate case, Quorum was accused of wrongdoing at an Alabama Hospital involving misallocated costs to inflate government payouts.

In April 2001, the company — one of the largest health care providers in the country — forked over $95.5 million to settle the two lawsuits.

Quorum Health recently surfaced as part of a newly formed consortium called Brooklyn Health Partners, which won the statewide bid to reopen LICH. It beat out eight other bidders to take over the troubled Cobble Hill facility, offering $250 million and a community-pleasing pledge to operate a 300- to 400-bed hospital at the site.

Brooklyn Health was cobbled together by California hospital provider Merrell Schexnydre, who reported that Quorum management would run the hospital.

But federal records show Quorum Health, a Tennessee firm that operates about 200 hospitals around the country, came under Justice Department scrutiny after a whistle-blower alleged the company was cooking its books and falsely receiving millions of dollars in Medicare reimbursement.

In announcing the Medicare fraud settlement in April 2001, the Justice Department declared “the civil settlement resolves allegations that (Quorum) made false statements in annual cost reports to various fiscal intermediaries, the companies that process Medicare cost reports for the government.”

The company also has several other recent lawsuits involving bankruptcy or negligence cases, including a federal suit filed in February in Mississippi in which a hospital claims Quorum's management was “so abysmal that the hospital’s chief financial officer vanished following a scathing report.”

The company did not respond to several phone calls seeking comment.

When Quorum settled the massive federal case it denied wrongdoing, but claimed it agreed to the penalty to put the matter to rest and move on.

Donnette Dunbar, a spokeswoman for Brooklyn Health, said Schexnydre selected Quorum because of his belief in their expertise as a top health provider. She was unaware of Quorum’s past troubles with the feds, and declined comment.

LICH had 500 beds — only 200 were filled — before the State University of New York shut the site last February after years of turmoil and financial troubles, bleeding about $13 million a month, state officials said. 

SUNY voted unanimously to close the hospital in February 2013. The decision met with a massive outcry and protest that included then mayoral candidate Bill de Blasio being arrested outside the facility last July.

In February, the state decided to accept bids to take over the struggling hospital with no application fees or monies required upfront.

SUNY did not respond to a request for comment.

Brooklyn Partners edged out Peebles Corporation and Witcoff Group, which had agreed to pay $260 million and planned to operate an emergency room and urgent care center.

With hundreds of jobs at stake, officials said, the offer to keep the site as a full-time hospital obviously helped the Brooklyn Partners bid, even though filling the beds has been a key problem.

SUNY expects to complete the transaction with Brooklyn Health by May 22.

In the meantime, Brooklyn Partners is looking for financial backers. The firm has until the first week of May to post 10 percent of its bid or lose its top spot for the facility.

Led by Schexnydre, who is a California real estate developer and former clinical lab supervisor, Brooklyn Health's proposal calls for a 150-bed temporary hospital with an emergency room, ambulatory care, intensive care, and other medical facilities to open while hospital construction is underway.

The consortium also promises to create 1,000 apartments, some below market rate, commercial space and medical offices on the campus.

If a new operator isn't selected, SUNY will likely give up control of the hospital in May 2014 and LICH will close.

Source: DNAinfo New York

Monday, April 21, 2014

The Importance behind Charitable Giving



There are many ways you can spend your hard earned dollars. And there is nothing wrong with rewarding yourself for your hard work and a job well done. But, what would happen if you rewarded someone else instead?   

Charitable giving is extremely important for a number of reasons. It extends a positive attitude beyond your inner circles, to the public and to the community. Supporting a cause can help keep you informed about issues in society.

Giving to charity may also improve your sense of well-being. You will be making a difference in the society and will also be promoting ethical behavior and morale. This leads to a better culture in the community and long-term benefits in societal culture.                                 

Despite her busy law practice, Attorney Inna Fershteyn continues to be involved and give back to the community. She is a President of the NY Association of Russian-Speaking Women Attorneys, a member of the Board of Directors of Edith and Carl Marks Jewish Community House of Bensonhurst, and a member of American Jewish Committee (AJC). She is also on the board of directors of Young Actors International Music Theater, Inc., a theatre for children aged 5 to 13 which produces Broadway-style plays and shows in Brooklyn and Manhattan.

She helped to establish The Menachem Education Foundation; established to professionalize Jewish Schools and offer the highest caliber of education to children.

There are also other ways to give back as well. Attorney Inna Fershteyn, who specializes in estate planning, notes the importance behind planning for children with disabilities. For parents who cannot afford to pay for an attorney, she assists them by helping with their estate planning for their children with disabilities- free of charge.

Ms. Fershteyn has also recently returned to her alma mater, New York University, to participate as a member of the first Family Advisory Council at NYU Langone Medical Center’s Sala Institute for Child and Family Centered Care.  

Ms. Fershteyn encourages everyone to give back in any and every way – whether it is money, your time, or your services. Charitable giving sets an example, inspires, and engages others to do the same. It encourages positive change to all around you.

Your actions are what define you in the eyes of others, and most importantly, in your own eyes. One small action from you can mean a huge difference to someone else. Giving back is among the most important and valuable things someone can do.

Law Office of Inna Fershteyn and Associates, P.C.
(718) 333-2394
1517 Voorhies Avenue, Suite 4
Brooklyn, NY 11235


Friday, April 18, 2014

Rich New Yorkers Face a Nasty Estate Tax Surprise

New York City. Park Avenue at dusk. 


If you're a New York multimillionaire, you now have another incentive to stay alive.

A change this month in New York's estate tax, which was billed as tax relief for the wealthy, contains a hidden wrinkle that could leave some multimillionaires with a much bigger surprise tax upon their death. Certain estates could even wind up with a tax rate of 164 percent on portions of their estates, according to one tax expert.

The changes were intended to ease the tax bill for wealthy New Yorkers and prevent them from fleeing to lower-tax states. A report from the Tax Foundation found that New York had the highest tax burden in the country as a percentage of state income. It found that New Yorkers spent 12.6 percent of their per capita income in 2011 on state and local taxes.

"It's nonsensical," said Kevin Matz, an accountant and attorney in White Plains, N.Y.
"The governor said this is about making New York a better climate for the wealthy. It's had the opposite effect."

On its face, the new law seems like tax relief. Under the previous law, New Yorkers paid estate taxes of 3.06 percent to 16 percent on the value of estates over $1 million. The new law raises that exclusion to $2.062 million this year and gradually increases it to more than $5 million by 2017.

But because the law also phases out certain credits related to federal taxes, people who have estates valued just above the $2 million threshold could get massive estate tax bills. An analysis by U.S. Trust found that a New York resident who dies today with a taxable estate of $2,165,625 could have to pay an estate tax of over $112,050. That represents a tax of over 100 percent on the value of the estate over $2,062,000.

It gets worse in a few years. Matz said that assuming that the exclusion rises to $5,250,000, a New Yorker with a taxable estate of $5,512,500 would have to pay an estate tax of $430,050. That's a marginal tax rate of 164 percent on the value of the estate above the exclusion.

"It's a bait and switch," Matz said.

The solution, he said, is to not phase out the tax credits. Or, the state could also allow them to phase out over a much longer period of time.

The New York State Society of CPAs and other groups have sent letters to New York lawmakers in hopes of getting a quick fix. So far, there has been little response.

A spokesman for the New York State Division of the Budget said that while the marginal rates may have changed, "No one's taxes have gone up. The dollar amount they pay does not increase."

He added that the tax change has insured that by the time it's fully implemented in 2017, 90 percent of New York's estates will no longer be taxed.

Matz, however, said the issue is not just a problem for the so-called rich. When you add up the value of property, pension plans, 401(k) plans and other assets, a New Yorker with just over $2 million in New York "is not exactly super rich. In a state with a high cost of living, that's not that unusual." 

Source: DailyFinance




Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Dirty Doctors: Does Spike In Physician Arrests In New York Reflect Ethics Crisis In American Medicine?

prescription
The fraudulent prescribing of drugs and tests is among the spate of recent physician crimes in states including New York and New Jersey.

Not long ago, Demetrios Gabriel was a respected pediatrician, well liked by his patients, with an unblemished professional history. The 46-year-old doctor, who graduated from New York Medical College in 1990, had no sanctions or malpractice claims against him, and his patients in Brooklyn and Staten Island had given him a five-star rating on HealthGrades.com. Then Gabriel saw a chance to make some extra money by accepting payments from a New Jersey lab for ordering unnecessary blood tests for his patients.

It was a simple arrangement. In exchange for ordering the tests, Gabriel was paid $200,000 ($4,500 per month) by Biodiagnostic Laboratory Services (BLS) of Parsippany, N.J., according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of New Jersey. Things went smoothly for a while. But after the arrangement was discovered -- prosecutors won’t say how they learned of his involvement -- Gabriel, of Gabriel Pediatrics, a group practice, was arrested and charged with accepting bribes from BLS (federal officials said Gabriel Pediatrics was not charged).

Gabriel pleaded guilty in federal court in Newark, N.J., and faces up to five years in prison. He was, according to the FBI, part of an ambitious bribery scheme that brought in more than $100 million in payments to BLS from Medicare and private insurers. The latest to admit guilt in this operation is Dr. Surender Gorukanti, a Brooklyn pediatrician who, according to federal officials, pleaded guilty on March 25 to accepting $14,000 ($1,000 per month) in bribes from BLS in return for doing the same thing Gabriel did: referring patient blood specimens to the lab.

The story of BLS and its corrupted doctors would be disturbing enough had it unfolded in isolation, had it been an aberration. It wasn’t. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of New Jersey, Gabriel and Gorukanti are just two of at least 19 New York-area doctors the New Jersey office alone has prosecuted in the past year, compared to just seven in the previous year. The physicians’ alleged crimes, mostly fraud-related, include mail, insurance, Medicare and employment fraud, as well as illegal sale of narcotic prescription drugs and accepting bribes.

Among the prosecuted doctors are many that, like Gabriel, enjoyed stellar reputations at the time of their arrests. Dr. Jose Katz, a cardiologist with offices on Fifth Avenue in New York and in New Jersey, spent more than two decades as a professor at Columbia University. He was sentenced in November to six and a half years in jail after admitting he intentionally misdiagnosed up to 80 percent of his patients with heart problems so he could collect $19 million in extra Medicare money. 
New Jersey U.S. Attorney spokesperson Rebekah Carmichael, whose office prosecuted Gabriel and Katz, said patients came to Katz for routine visits and most left with false diagnoses of coronary artery disease and angina and orders to undergo unnecessary tests, many of which were "contraindicated for the patient." Judge Jose Linares of U.S. District Court in Newark told AP that Katz perpetrated a medical fraud so vast that "it boggles the mind.”

Is This a Trend?

While hesitant to call the increased number of doctor prosecutions a trend, Carmichael said there has been a “definite increase, a spike” in arrests this past year, and that the actual number could be even higher than 19. "This isn't a number we keep in a formal way,” she said. “It’s a list we keep internally in the public affairs office for our own reference. We can’t just run the numbers; there is no database on arrested doctors. So this list of 19 isn't necessarily exhaustive."

The U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of New York, which encompasses Manhattan, also said it doesn’t keep specific statistics on doctor prosecutions, but its spokesperson, Jennifer Queliz, said attorneys there, too, are actively working doctor corruption cases, specifically ones that involve the illegal sale of narcotic painkillers, which has reached epidemic proportions in recent years.

Richard Zabel, a deputy U.S. Attorney with the Southern District of New York, told IBTimes, “In a number of these cases, unfortunately, doctors have become prescription machines and abdicated their role as professionals. Where appropriate, we will prosecute, but the medical profession and licensing authorities need to also take a look at whether such individuals should continue in the practice of medicine.”  

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has made the prosecution of unethical doctors a focus of his administration in the past year. In August, Cuomo signed a law that will eventually allow authorities to track prescriptions more closely and help prevent doctors from illegally prescribing and selling these drugs. And in October, the governor banned 18 doctors from billing New York’s no-fault auto insurance system as part of his statewide initiative to stop the abuse of the no-fault insurance system, which costs New Yorkers hundreds of millions of dollars in unnecessary insurance costs.

“Doctors and medical service providers who conspire to abuse the system should know that New York State is watching and will not hesitate to take appropriate actions to shut down fraud when it occurs,” Cuomo said in a statement last year.

Doctor corruption is clearly not unique to the U.S. An exhaustive study last year by the European Commission on Corruption in the Healthcare Sector found that bribery of doctors in EU countries is common and "often related to preferential treatment – particular to bypassing waiting lists." Bribery of doctors occurs most frequently in former transition economies of Central and Eastern Europe, where it is "seen as common practice," the study concluded, but it is also "widespread" in Greece and Italy. The study also found that improper financial relationships between drug companies and doctors in Europe is "problematic" and may lead to "higher drug prices or increased drug consumption by the population." But the study found that these relationships are declining in Europe because of increased public demand for doctors to declare conflict of interests and for stricter legislation. 

One scandal cited in the study involved Mediator, the amphetamine drug introduced by French doctor and diet guru Pierre Dukan. The drug, which was marketed to overweight diabetics but also prescribed by doctors to healthy women who wanted to lose weight, prompted changes in how many doctors police themselves, the study found. Mediator has killed at least 500 people by damaging their heart valves, according to the French health ministry. That scandal has led to more self-regulation among European doctors as well as "the introduction of legislation [throughout Europe] that is inspired by the American Physician Payments Sunshine Act," which is a part of Obamacare, the European Commission study concluded.
 
Tarnished by Greed and Dishonesty

Law enforcement sources won’t speculate as to why doctor arrests have been increasing in New York. But the high-profile arrests are giving the city an unenviable reputation. One New York physician -- Dr. Evan Levine, a New York cardiologist and clinical assistant professor of medicine at Montefiore Medical Center-Albert Einstein College of Medicine -- said the arrests are evidence of a disturbing trend not only in New York but in American medicine nationwide.

“The system has become tarnished by greed and dishonesty,” said Levine, who’s the director of the Saint Joseph's Cardiovascular Center in Yonkers. Levine, who in 2005 published a controversial book, "What Your Doctor Won’t (Or Can’t) Tell You," said doctor corruption isn’t new, “but it wasn’t previously on such a grand scale as it is now.”

Levine personally knows some of the New York doctors who’ve recently been arrested, and has earned a reputation among his fellow physicians and among hospital administrators and drug company executives as a critic of his own profession in the media and on his own blog. He spoke with IBTimes about the recent arrests because, he said, he wants patients to know the truth about the healthcare scams that are taking place across the country.

Levine, who every year since 2001 has been named “Top Doctor in Cardiovascular Medicine” in the New York metro area by the Castle Connolly Guide, thinks the majority of America’s doctors are still honest. But he said more of them than ever are succumbing to the temptation to participate in crimes, mostly because of greed. He cited fellow New York cardiologist Rohan Wijetilaka, whose medical license had already been revoked for performing unnecessary tests on patients and who is now accused of fraud and peddling painkillers. Wijetilaka pleaded not guilty in federal court in December, reported New York News 12. Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said in a statement at the time of Wijetilaka’s arrest that Wijetilaka, who's scheduled to go to trial in September, was a “corrupt physician” who will “no longer be in a position to violate the Hippocratic oath to which he swore, jeopardize the health and well-being of his patients, or break the law.”

What troubles Levine most, he says, is that there seems to be less shame attached to such wrongdoing than there was in the past. After Wijetilaka lost his practice, Levine noted, when doctors and hospitals might be expected to distance themselves from him, “some flocked to make some type of deal with him to get the patients he could no longer see.”

As further evidence of physician wrongdoing, Levine pointed to an article that ran in the January edition of the American Heart Association’s journal that lists a database of the use in New York of diagnostic coronary angiography, a special X-ray test used to show if coronary arteries are blocked or narrowed. Patients in the database were rated as appropriate, uncertain or inappropriate for the procedure, and the database found that only 35 percent of all the coronary angiograms between 2010 and 2011 were "appropriate" for patients, while 25 percent were considered "without merit."

“In just that single year, there were more than 2,000 patients who had a cardiac angiogram even though they had no symptoms suggestive of coronary disease or even a stress test exam prior to the procedure,” Levine said. “In other words, it appears that at least 2,000 people were put through an invasive procedure with risks that include stroke, heart attack and death, when they didn’t need it.”
For this relatively simple procedure, which can be performed in under half an hour, Levine said the bill can reach $8,000. “By comparison, it would require a general practitioner to see about 124 patients, for an intermediate visit, in order to bill $8,000, based on Medicare rates,” he said. “An efficient lab should be able to perform around 12 diagnostic angiogram studies in a day, per room, billing around $96,000.”

One of the Most Shocking Cases

Despite the efforts of politicians and law enforcement agencies, it appears not much has changed since October 2012, when 91 people including doctors, nurses and other medical professionals were reportedly charged with committing $430 million in Medicare fraud in New York and six other U.S. cities. The Daily Mail reported that the charges ranged from healthcare fraud and conspiracy to kickback violations, identity theft and money laundering. Attorney General Eric Holder called it the largest alleged medical fraud bust of its kind in U.S. history. 

Supporting Levine’s contention that the problem runs deeper than New Jersey and New York are cases involving the prosecution of unethical doctors across the U.S. In the Boston area last month, Dr. Fathalla Mashali, a pain medicine physician, was arrested and accused of prescribing high-dose narcotics to patients who were known to be drug abusers and whose medical conditions did not warrant it, and of fraudulently billing Medicare for physical exams that never occurred, according to the Boston Business Journal.

In Chicago last month, Dr. Sathish Narayanappa Babu was arrested and charged with dispensing prescription medications illegally and fraudulently billing Medicare, federal authorities told the Chicago Tribune. Agents reportedly seized more than $100,000 from the bank accounts of Babu's company, Anik Life Sciences Medical Corp.

An Atlanta-area doctor was indicted earlier this month on federal charges of illegally distributing painkillers. AP reported that Dr. Sanjay Sinha of Woodstock, Ga., is accused of visiting casinos, befriending casino employees and writing them prescriptions for hundreds of pills.

Ethicist Jack Marshall, an attorney, teacher and president and founder of ProEthics, a Washington D.C.-based company that offers training sessions on ethics for doctors, lawyers and other professionals, said the financial uncertainties now facing medicine probably play a part in causing more doctors to cheat and steal. 

“They entered the profession with expectations of a certain level of affluence,” he said. “Of course, true professionals are supposed to eschew money for the public good. Doctors also tend to be narcissists, and are hostage to what I call self-validating virtue: If they do it, it must be OK, because they are good people. Or so they think.”

Marshall noted physicians tend to be held in high esteem by the public because they are seen as inherently good, and in his view have been allowed to “self regulate.” He added, “Doctors are lax in reporting professional misconduct," and said criminal misconduct isn't even discussed in medical school ethics classes. "The focus there is typically on bioethics," he said.

Some physicians see Levine as unnecessarily critical, said Dr. Robert Meyer, an emergency room physician at the Montefiore Medical Center in New York who has worked with Levine for more than 20 years. But dismissing Levine’s criticism ignores the realities of physician abuse, he said. That abuse, he said, goes beyond the court cases to encompass hospitals doing unnecessary tests and rewarding ER docs who are incentivized to admit or not admit patients depending on the Medicare billing cycle, and the hiring of physicians by pharmaceutical companies to author ostensibly scientific studies and speak on behalf of their medications.

Big Pharma and Doctors

One aspect of medical ethics that has been much debated is the evolving relationship between physicians and big drug companies. In his 2004 book "On the Take," Dr. Jerome Kassirer, former editor-in-chief of The New England Journal of Medicine, looked at how the financial relationships between doctors and big pharma sometimes leads to bias and to doctors giving dangerously misleading and even false information to their patients.

“There’s been an increase in pressure on doctors across the board over the last decade or so, especially with respect to their incomes,” said Kassirer, who had a medical practice for 30 years and has taught internal medicine at Yale, Stanford and Tufts University. “That resulted in more doctors taking more money from the pharmaceutical industry. As doctor fees and other things got tighter, we saw more attempts by doctors to bolster their incomes in a number of ways, and not just in criminal but in other unethical ways. That kind of erosion of professional ethics is extremely bothersome.”

At least on that front, the problem appears to be getting better, not worse. Drug company payments to physicians actually dropped between 2011 and 2012, partly because of greater transparency, according to ProPublica. In an effort to reduce potential conflicts of interest, drug companies have in recent years begun releasing details of payments to doctors for promotional talks, research and consulting.

As of 2012, 15 drug companies published the information, most because of legal settlements. Some of the nation’s largest drug companies, including Eli Lilly, Pfizer and Novartis, have cut payments to physicians for promotional speeches amid heightened public scrutiny of such spending, a ProPublica analysis shows.

Kassirer attributes this drop in part to the Physician Payment Sunshine Act, a part of Obamacare, which in September will require all drug companies to publicly report payments to doctors.

“Doctors know what’s coming and they’re becoming more reluctant to sign up with drug companies because they don’t want their name on a searchable database,” Kassirer said.

Despite predictions that the Affordable Care Act would be vulnerable to fraud, Levine said the system has so far not been widely abused. Recent arrests, he claimed, are unrelated to the new law. Still, Levine doesn’t believe the act goes far enough to fix the inherent ethical quandary associated with payments made to physicians by drug companies.

“The Sunshine Act brings transparency to what doctors are paid from big pharma, and for that important step I support it,” he said. “But it does not prevent physicians from reaching backroom deals for some quid pro quo arrangement: 'You write my drug and you get paid lectures.' This remains the problem and it will continue. It will embarrass some doctors, but not many, to stop working these unwritten deals with pharma, and it is just a first, trivial step in the right direction.”

In Levine’s view, guilty doctors have been influenced by a larger culture that is “polluted by images of the ultra-rich. People seem more enamored of money today than ever, and this is translated to some physicians who see income as by far their most important goal and sometimes their only goal. Most doctors work very hard and are actually underpaid. The problem is, if you speak up and challenge the ethics of a hospital administrator or drug company or fellow doctor and show the slightest bit of irreverence, regardless of whether you are right, you will be a target for revenge.”

New Jersey U.S. Attorney spokesperson Carmichael said that when doctors put profits over patients to the point of fraud, “there are repercussions for all who use our health care system. Overbilling, over-testing, bribery and other crimes not only defraud the government and insurers, they also undermine the integrity of the doctor-patient relationship. Our office, as part of a robust health care fraud focus, has made a conscious effort to hold individual doctors accountable for their crimes and to deter others who might be tempted.”

Source: International Business Times

 

Friday, April 11, 2014

Careful, Thoughtful Drafting Essential In Estate Planning

On April 5, 2004, Ms. Ann Dunn Aldrich wrote her Will on an “E–Z Legal Form.” In Article III, entitled “Bequests,” just after the form’s pre-printed language “direct[ing] that after payment of all my just debts, my property be bequeathed in the manner following,” she hand wrote instructions directing that all of the following “possessions listed” go to her sister, Mary Jane Eaton:

— House, contents, lot at 150 SW Garden Street, Keystone Heights FL 32656

— Fidelity Rollover IRA 162–583405 (800–544–6565)

— United Defense Life Insurance (800–247–2196)

— Automobile Chevy Tracker, 2CNBE 13c916952909 —All bank accounts at M & S Bank 2226448, 264679, 0900020314 (352–473–7275).

Ann also wrote: “If Mary Jane Eaton dies before I do, I leave all listed to James Michael Aldrich, 2250 S. Palmetto 114 S Daytona FL 32119.” The Will contained no other dispositive provisions. It was was duly signed and witnessed.

Ms. Eaton died three years later, survived by Ann.   Mary Jane left Ann a substantial amount of cash and land. On October 9, 2009, Ann Dunn Aldrich herself died, not having revised her Will to dispose of the inheritance she had received from her sister.

Article III of Ann’s Will made specific bequests of the property which Ann owned on the date she executed her Will,   but was silent as to the property which Ann later inherited from Mary Jane.  Moreover, Ann’s Will lacked a residuary clause (“I devise and bequeath and all of the rest, residue, and remainder of my property to ___________”).  It was thus unclear who would succeed to the property which Ann inherited from Mary Jane.  Ann’s brother James Aldrich argued that under Article III of Ann’s Will he was entitled to the property inherited from Mary Jane.   Laurie Basile and Leanne Krajewski, Ann’s nieces and the daughters of Ann’s predeceased brother, asserted that Ann’s Will failed to effectively dispose of the property inherited from Mary Jane, and thus that such property passed pursuant to the Florida statute of intestacy.  Under the Florida statute of intestacy, that property would pass one-half to James and one-quarter each to Laurie Basile and Leanne Krajewski.

James Aldrich secured appointment as Ann’s personal representative of Ann’s estate.  He petitioned the Probate Court to determine who was entitled to the property inherited by Ann from Mary Jane.  The testator’s intent controls interpretation of a will.  But that intent can only be divined from the four corners of the will; courts do not consider extrinsic evidence of testamentary intent.

Ann’s April 5, 2004 Will was found among her papers after her death.  Also found among Ann’s papers was a document dated November 18, 2008, and entitled “Just a Note.” The latter document was in Ann’s handwriting and provided:

This is an addendum to my will dated April 5, 2004. Since my sister Mary jean Eaton has passed away, I reiterate that all my worldly possessions pass to my brother James Michael Aldrich, 2250 S. Palmetto, S. Daytona FL 32119.

With her agreement I name Sheila Aldrich Schuh, my niece, as my personal representative, and have assigned certain bank accounts to her to be transferred on my death for her use as she seems [sic] fit.
The “Just a Note” “addendum” was signed only by Ann Aldrich and Sheila Schuh, James Aldrich’s daughter.  The document was legally ineffective as an amendment (“codicil”) to Ann’s April 5, 2004 Will, because it had only one witness, and Florida law requires two witnesses to a testamentary instrument.

The Probate Court held that James succeeded to the property which Ann had inherited from Mary Jane, but the Florida Court of Appeal reversed.  The Supreme Court of Florida had no doubt that Ann intended that James receive the property which she had inherited from Mary Jane.  But Ann had failed to express that intent in a legally effective testamentary document.  As a result, the Supreme Court of Florida held, and properly so, the property which Ann inherited from Mary Jane passed to James Aldrich, Laurie Basile, and Leanne Krajewski, according to the Florida statute of intestacy.

There is a common aversion to using lawyers.  Justice Pariente, in her concurring opinion, aptly described this as “penny-wise and pound-foolish” in Ann Aldrich’s case.

Of course using a lawyer is no guarantee of competence.  Many years ago, clients of mine were alarmed to learn of a probate estate opened for their father by a woman claiming to be his widow.  Investigation revealed that a marriage had indeed been solemnized between them.  The woman was many years the man’s junior, and had entered his life as a live-in housekeeper, after the death of his first wife, my clients’ mother.  The man left a will, drawn by his second wife’s attorney, bequeathing his “business” to his sons, and the balance of his property to the woman.  The business was a corporation, and it operated on land which the man owned in his name, i.e., which had not been conveyed to the corporation. The testator probably intended the bequest to his sons to include the land, but the matter was not free of doubt.  Fortunately, the sons reached a settlement with the woman which allocated the business real property, with the business, to the sons.

It is important that you not only have estate planning documents, but that you review them and ascertain that they competently, effectively dispose of your estate according to your intentions.

Source: Forbes


Monday, April 7, 2014

Medicare Seniors Like ObamaCare's Team Approach

As the U.S. health care system moves away from fee-for-service medicine to more accountable care that uses a teamof health professionals, seniors covered by Medicare say they are okay with these new models that include nurses, social workers and other allied health professionals in the front lines of their treatment, according to a new analysis.

Increasingly, the Medicare health insurance program for the elderly as part of the Affordable Care Act is moving to a system that rewards doctors and hospitals for working together to improve care. By contracting with entities known as accountable care organizations and patient-centered medical homes, the providers use a team approach that can involve lower cost providers and allied health professionals to provide seniors with more attention while at the same time keeping them healthy and out of more expensive care settings.

A new national survey of adults 65 and older from the John A. Hartford Foundation about “team care and the medical home” shows 27 percent say they get this kind of care right now, they like it and it has improved their health.  The openness to new models debunks theories by some in health care who think patients only want to see a doctor for all their health care needs.

The bulk of the sample, or 73 percent say they want such care and 61 percent say they believe it would improve their health. The survey, conducted for John A Hartford by PerryUndem Research/Communication, polled 1,107 adults who were age 65 or older in late January and early February of this year.

“The weaknesses of care coordination in our current system represent a clear and present danger to many older patients, causing avoidable harm, errors, complications, overtreatment, and avoidable hospital admissions and readmissions,” said Christopher Langston, program director of the John A. Hartford Foundation.

New models of health care delivery such as patient-centered medical homes and accountable care organizations emphasize the use of primary care health professionals like nurse practitioners and physician assistants and even social workers to more aggressively ensure patients are seeking regular care, taking their medicines and following their diets all in the name of keeping them out of the more expensive care setting like hospitals.

All major insurance carriers like Aetna, Cigna, Humana, UnitedHealth Group and Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans are contracting more and more with ACOs and patient centered medical homes while moving away from paying providers on a fee for service basis.

Medicare, too, is moving aggressively toward more accountable models with success achieving savings.

In the first year of the Medicare Shared Savings Program, almost half of the ACOs that started operations in 2012 had lower medical expenses than projected, exceeding their quality benchmarks, according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. There were 29 ACOs that generated shared savings of more than $125 million.

Currently, Medicare beneficiaries are assigned an ACO through the doctor that provides most of their primary care services. As of February 2014, more than 5.3 million Medicare beneficiaries received care through an ACO model.

But accountable models like medical homes aren’t quite ready for prime time, citing studies that have questioned their results.

“Team care is still a work in progress,” Langston said.

Still, the support of seniors to a team approach means medical homes and other accountable care models have a promising future, the survey indicates.

“The fact that older adults say that team care improved their health is very significant,” Langston said. “We should build on this finding, improve the model, and make team care available to more patients who can benefit from it.”

Source: Forbes

 

Friday, April 4, 2014

Attorney Inna Fershteyn Joins NYU Pediatrics Family Advisory Council



New York – April 2, 2014

Despite her busy law practice, New York Attorney InnaFershteyn continues to be involved in the community. Ms. Fershteyn will be returning to her alma mater, New York University, to participate as an active member of the first Family Advisory Council at NYU Langone Medical Center’s Sala Institute for Child and Family-Centered Care. 

Family Advisory Boards or Councils are a group of dedicated parents and family members of pediatric patients who are committed to working with hospital staff and administration to provide family-centered care to patients. Patient Family Advisory Councils are key to a successful and quality patient-centered care facility.

The goal of the Family Advisory Council is to provide the patient and family perspective as well as share expertise with health care professionals to support family-centered care. 

The Council is comprised of a broad representation of families from diverse backgrounds and staff from many disciplines. Everyone is committed to partnering with families to advance family-centered care.